Questions for bully & APBTA 'type' owners

stafinois

Professional Nerd
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
1,617
Likes
1
Points
0
Location
Mayberry
I agree with Adrianne. While I can't say that there is nothing wrong with the breed, a quick look around tells you otherwise, I fear that the breed is stuck, and likely doomed. I see a lot of gamebred dogs that are so ridiculously soft, if not outright shy, and wonder what is the purpose of such a dog? A dog like that can sometimes make a nice pet if it never leaves the property, but the fact that its hell on other dogs doesn't necessarily translate to being able to persevere against adversity outside the box.

What is the purpose of a dog that can fight another with great skill, but can do nothing else? But then when fanciers start getting into obedience, agility, IPO, etc, they are changing/ruining the breed. I say, if the breed is going to survive, it needs to adapt. There was nothing "wrong" with our hunter/gatherer ancestors, but we had to evolve. So does the APBT. The alternative is extinction.

“It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change.” ~ Charles Darwin



I recently turned down a pup that was a double grandson of this dog. I just can't bring myself to risk another APBT/AmStaf in Iowa. This is not a good place for them. Luckily one of my best pals got a bitch from the litter (a clone of her mother, my fave bitch of all time), and the breeder is a friend who is keeping me up to date on the progress of the litter. Should something change in Iowa, I will have a linebred Danni pup.
 

Sweet72947

Squishy face
Joined
May 18, 2006
Messages
9,159
Likes
1
Points
38
Location
Northern Virginia
only dogs & people will continue to fight after they have lost (although there is some indication jaguars & ocelots will try but they are relatively fragile). nearly all animals even big predators like bears will seek to run more than fight & when the option of running is exhausted they will offer a limited fight & then just lay down to be killed. so the ONLY way to consistantly test gameness is by matching two relatively game dogs to find out which is more game.
I can see arguments for and against the use of hog hunting as a tool for testing the gameness of an APBT; Dog fighting was never meant to necessarily watch two dogs kill each other. Testing against other, equally matched dogs is the "best" method because the fights tend to be drawn out long enough to push the dogs to their breaking point and give a better overall picture of the dog's heart and will to continue despite pain and exhaustion. That is gameness in a nutshell. Again, the goal wasn't necessarily for one dog to kill the other despite the fact that it occasionally happens. Hogs would be a decent test of gameness, if it wasn't for the fact that if you leave a single dog on a hog long enough, the dog is going to get gored to death...the hog has the unfair advantage of several hundred pounds and a set of built in daggers. You can armor up your dog with all kinds of catch vests and collars, but then you're taking away one of the key aspects of proving a dog game.
So the hog-dogging isn't a good test because it's considered an uneven match. I get that. But once you prove your dog is game, then what?

I know that in other countries, they have used some amount of matching to test working dogs. I can't remember what breed or country it was, I think it was in Turkey with Akbash dogs (or Kangals perhaps), I can't remember. But they use these dogs on rural farms for different work and they do match them sometimes to test them. I don't condone dog fighting of any kind, but at least I can see the purpose. These dogs have a function.

Did the APBT of yesteryear have a function outside the box that required this much sought-after trait of gameness? In the stories I have seen told about the old dogmen, keeping the dogs as pets or doing other things with them outside of matching seems like it was an afterthought.
 

crazedACD

Active Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
3,048
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
West Missouri
Well this has been educational ;).

See, in my humble opinion, personally, I am fine with whatever you want your dogs to be, or what you want them for (I don't necessarily condone dog fighting, but it is what it is for now). I think plenty of (laymen) people don't understand why I am interested in a specific type of dog for specific dog sports, or herding, or whatever..and I suppose that is the comparison to people wanting to keep the gamebred APBT around. I wouldn't want that type of dog, but I get it.

A major problem isn't the dogs themselves, but the automatic implied criminalization of people who want such dogs, even if those people have never broken a single law (not even a speeding ticket) nor had any intentions to do so.

There's a great divide amongst "pit bull" people, and one side is standing and pointing at the other side calling them "dog fighters" regardless of whether or not they ever fought a dog. The accusation is being made solely because those people, whether because of or regardless of the APBT history, want a dog from a well-known gamedog bloodline. These accusers refuse to admit that it's very possible to love the APB as it was and is without harboring secret criminal thoughts.

Not everyone wants to change the APBT. To want to change it is admitting there's something wrong with it, and there's nothing **** wrong with the APBT as it was 100 years ago or 50 years ago or 30 years ago. But thanks to people breeding all willy nilly in an effort to change it, there's a helluva lot wrong with it now.
Now I'm not saying this is totally anyone's fault, mine or yours or the breeders or the rescues. I think there's a collective fail in part with everyone. My problem with this breed, and several other bully types (I'll stay out of the semantics) is the sheer number of dogs being produced and ending up given up again. They are nearly totally unwanted, and yet the first breed anyone can get because they are so plentiful. They are being produced to be exterminated. And then your gamebred type dog ends up with Joe Schmoe and bad things happen because they don't understand. And you know it's not even Joe Schmoe...the breed attracts undesirable people to own it. I'm not trying to judge people, but when I see a pit bull walking down the street, 9 times out of 10 they don't appear to be upstanding citizens. So yes..if you are properly managing this breed, and taking steps to make sure they don't get loose, and responsibly breeding and taking back dogs that don't work out...by all means have at it. But that's not what's happening, and it's really the downfall of the breed.

And this is almost where you can see stepping in with breeding legislation, and almost BSL, I'm not a supporter and never will be. IBut there IS a problem and unfortunately those are the solutions that people have come up with...because unless the community for those breeds can come together and figure out a way to reduce the population, that is the end result. It sucks for YOU, APBT fanciers, the good breeders, and really all breed dog people. But...what's the other solution?
 
S

SevenSins

Guest
I'm not trying to judge people, but when I see a pit bull walking down the street, 9 times out of 10 they don't appear to be upstanding citizens.
Just out of morbid curiosity...what makes these 9 out of 10 Pit Bull walkers not appear to be upstanding citizens? What does an upstanding citizen look like?
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
6,405
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
Minnesota
I'm not trying to judge people, but when I see a pit bull walking down the street, 9 times out of 10 they don't appear to be upstanding citizens.
Oh man, it seems like 9.9 times out of 10 around here they are hard-core rescue/ pit bull/ responsible owner advocates. Almost to a fanatical degree.
 

AdrianneIsabel

Glutton for Crazy
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Messages
8,893
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
Portland, Oregon
Just out of morbid curiosity...what makes these 9 out of 10 Pit Bull walkers not appear to be upstanding citizens? What does an upstanding citizen look like?
Oh man, it seems like 9.9 times out of 10 around here they are hard-core rescue/ pit bull/ responsible owner advocates. Almost to a fanatical degree.
Both of these....

and LOL @ the bolded, that is so common here.

I wonder, seriously, what Denis and I look like when we walk Arnold and Shamoo around our neighborhood.
 

Miakoda

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
7,666
Likes
0
Points
0
Crazed, I never owned over 60 APBTs at one time. I produced 3 litters, and on this date, I can tell you where each dog can be found. I didn't sell a single puppy, nor would I ever. I have no desire to breed puppies to sell to the general public. Ever.

If you read my posts, the number of dogs under my name account for all my personal dogs, each puppy from each litter, and every single rescue fog I took in, including dogs I picked up on the side of the road. But regardless of that list, or the fact that I WORKED at that same clinic for years as a vet tech, there's no way in hell I'll accept part of the blame. I did nothing wrong. Why should I be partly to blame, and why on earth is it ok for me to be viewed as "guilty until proven innocent"???

ETA: or did I completely misunderstand your post? That happens when I'm trying to type and bring used as a jungle gym by three rowdy children.
 
Last edited:

Pops2

Active Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Messages
3,072
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
UT
So the hog-dogging isn't a good test because it's considered an uneven match. I get that. But once you prove your dog is game, then what?
then it is ready to be evaluated for breedworthiness


I know that in other countries, they have used some amount of matching to test working dogs. I can't remember what breed or country it was, I think it was in Turkey with Akbash dogs (or Kangals perhaps), I can't remember. But they use these dogs on rural farms for different work and they do match them sometimes to test them. I don't condone dog fighting of any kind, but at least I can see the purpose. These dogs have a function.
the turks match kangals & boz because they just don't have enough wolves & for recreation. the russians & COs, the Afghans & koochee dogs same. but they are doing it as much for recreation as for testing.


Did the APBT of yesteryear have a function outside the box that required this much sought-after trait of gameness? In the stories I have seen told about the old dogmen, keeping the dogs as pets or doing other things with them outside of matching seems like it was an afterthought.
NO, matching was their meat & potatoes. anything besides the box was gravy. being a loving & well mannered family pet or a good hog dog is just a pleasant extra.
 

cliffdog

New Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2011
Messages
348
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
LA (Lower Alabama)
Cliff, I don't think that quote you posted has anything to do with Dog Aggression? It's about children...
The point of the quote being, "He would not bother a [soul]" meaning other dogs. Further:
Demo would not bother a dog unless attacked. Demo was the sire of Colby's Brandy, a solid brindle dog with a temperament jut the opposite: Brandy would grab anthing that had fur and four legs, including a bitch in heat.
 

Pops2

Active Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Messages
3,072
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
UT
Well I didn't mention "pit bulldog" anywhere in my post so I suppose if that's the case then he sidestepped the question again. I was very specifically referencing what people refer to as "real APBTs." ;)
yep i sidestepped it. here's why. i believe the APBT SHOULD be synonymous w/ pit bulldog but laws & money grubbing registries prevent it. I firmly believe the ONLY CONSISTANT breedworthiness test is proving gameness in the box. Recognizing that it is illegal and not everyone has the means to send potential breeding stock to Japan (no one else legally matches cajun rules in the highly regulated fashion of the Japanese), i am willing to compromise on the dogs doing honest work like denning coyotes or badgers or killing barn coon and catching hogs or cattle. I'd like to see them worked on more difficult game like holing bobcats, catching mt lion & pinning bear for knife & spear hunters. i would not oppose matching being legalized & regulated like it is in Japan. and since none of the dogs pictured have any marks indicating honest work or matching then in MY OPINION none are "real APBTs"
 

cliffdog

New Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2011
Messages
348
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
LA (Lower Alabama)
I know, and it's sad. Sorry that my dog is capable of standing amongst other dogs, and even likes them (yeah, I've had people tell me he's not a real Bully breed because he's dog friendly)! Oh and that I have (and am working toward) titles on him. My bad.

FWIW, I'm not saying ALL ADBA people are this way, but those are the people that throw those comments around.
That's because ADBA people are show dog people. They love the illusion that their show bred dogs can work and so they put on that their dogs, because they are lean and holler in the ring, must be far better than those show dogs. But they forget that their dog has never done anything other than show, and their dogs grandparents never did anything but show. But, wait- since their dogs lunge, they are working dogs.

Frankly I prefer the ADBA atmosphere to the AKC atmosphere but let me be frank, as much as ADBA people hoot and holler that their dogs are the REAL American Pit Bull Terrier... if I could not get a game-bred dog, I would much prefer a working-bred American Staffordshire Terrier to an ADBA show-bred APBT. Yes, ADBA APBTs weight pull, but AmStaffs weight pull also with the UKC, and they also do Agility, Obedience, Dock Dogs, etc. There is a dearth of sport dogs in the ADBA because it is beneath their "REAL" APBTs. And like Miakoda, most people who actually have true working APBTs have no need for show ribbons, their dogs do their work on the hog. So these dogs are often not registered or shown with the ADBA. A dog that catches a 300lb hog does not need to prance around a ring to prove he is worth something.
 

Pops2

Active Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Messages
3,072
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
UT
That's because ADBA people are show dog people. They love the illusion that their show bred dogs can work and so they put on that their dogs, because they are lean and holler in the ring, must be far better than those show dogs. But they forget that their dog has never done anything other than show, and their dogs grandparents never did anything but show. But, wait- since their dogs lunge, they are working dogs.

Frankly I prefer the ADBA atmosphere to the AKC atmosphere but let me be frank, as much as ADBA people hoot and holler that their dogs are the REAL American Pit Bull Terrier... if I could not get a game-bred dog, I would much prefer a working-bred American Staffordshire Terrier to an ADBA show-bred APBT. Yes, ADBA APBTs weight pull, but AmStaffs weight pull also with the UKC, and they also do Agility, Obedience, Dock Dogs, etc. There is a dearth of sport dogs in the ADBA because it is beneath their "REAL" APBTs. And like Miakoda, most people who actually have true working APBTs have no need for show ribbons, their dogs do their work on the hog. So these dogs are often not registered or shown with the ADBA. A dog that catches a 300lb hog does not need to prance around a ring to prove he is worth something.
i actually agree w/this. for catching hogs you don't need a lot of dog & too much can even be a PITA.
 

Barbara!

New Member
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
1,457
Likes
0
Points
0
Just out of morbid curiosity...what makes these 9 out of 10 Pit Bull walkers not appear to be upstanding citizens? What does an upstanding citizen look like?
I guess an upstanding citizen looks like someone who is walking with their pants around their hips and not around their ankles. Is walking their dog on a leash and not on a chain. Is clean cut and isn't covered in jail tattoos. Is it a stereotype? Yes. It most certainly is. Is it a stereotype that is more often than not, correct? Yes. I agree totally that most pit bull type dog owners are not "upstanding citizens".
 
S

SevenSins

Guest
yep i sidestepped it. here's why. i believe the APBT SHOULD be synonymous w/ pit bulldog but laws & money grubbing registries prevent it. I firmly believe the ONLY CONSISTANT breedworthiness test is proving gameness in the box. Recognizing that it is illegal and not everyone has the means to send potential breeding stock to Japan (no one else legally matches cajun rules in the highly regulated fashion of the Japanese), i am willing to compromise on the dogs doing honest work like denning coyotes or badgers or killing barn coon and catching hogs or cattle. I'd like to see them worked on more difficult game like holing bobcats, catching mt lion & pinning bear for knife & spear hunters. i would not oppose matching being legalized & regulated like it is in Japan. and since none of the dogs pictured have any marks indicating honest work or matching then in MY OPINION none are "real APBTs"
Now don't get me wrong, I'm all for hunting and I've owned my fair share of hunting dogs/"real APBTs" if you're counting hog dogs. But you do realize that a) hunting doesn't prove deep gameness, so your logic that only game tested dogs are APBTs "but hunting counts" is flawed right out of the starting gate, and b) this is 2012, not 1812...hunting with dogs is no longer necessary to the survival of most people in western society, so what exactly are we getting out of setting dogs on bear (in terms of breedworthiness) aside from having something to brag about, and just because we can? Again, in case anyone missed it, I'm all for hunting with or without dogs. But let's be completely honest, most people hunt with dogs as a hobby, because it's entertaining for them to watch the dog work and/or work with the dog. Same reason people do ringsport, or weightpull. It's not a JOB, it's a SPORT. I enjoy watching rugged working terriers, like Jagds, do their so-called "jobs"... but terms like "honest work" and "purpose" are subjective because in almost all cases we don't NEED dogs to do the work anymore. It's all nostalgia.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
2,365
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
High Ridge, MO
There was a very excited Golden at the dock jump today who was barking and pulling on the lead. I was thinking to myself how much he looked like an ADBA dog. That is all.
 

cliffdog

New Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2011
Messages
348
Likes
0
Points
0
Location
LA (Lower Alabama)
Now don't get me wrong, I'm all for hunting and I've owned my fair share of hunting dogs/"real APBTs" if you're counting hog dogs. But you do realize that a) hunting doesn't prove deep gameness, so your logic that only game tested dogs are APBTs "but hunting counts" is flawed right out of the starting gate, and b) this is 2012, not 1812...hunting with dogs is no longer necessary to the survival of most people in western society, so what exactly are we getting out of setting dogs on bear (in terms of breedworthiness) aside from having something to brag about, and just because we can? Again, in case anyone missed it, I'm all for hunting with or without dogs. But let's be completely honest, most people hunt with dogs as a hobby, because it's entertaining for them to watch the dog work and/or work with the dog. Same reason people do ringsport, or weightpull. It's not a JOB, it's a SPORT. I enjoy watching rugged working terriers, like Jagds, do their so-called "jobs"... but terms like "honest work" and "purpose" are subjective because in almost all cases we don't NEED dogs to do the work anymore. It's all nostalgia.
If you think hog dogs are not needed, I guess you've never had your farm torn up by a group of hogs before. ;)
 
S

SevenSins

Guest
I guess an upstanding citizen looks like someone who is walking with their pants around their hips and not around their ankles. Is walking their dog on a leash and not on a chain. Is clean cut and isn't covered in jail tattoos. Is it a stereotype? Yes. It most certainly is. Is it a stereotype that is more often than not, correct? Yes. I agree totally that most pit bull type dog owners are not "upstanding citizens".
Where the hell do these people live where 9 out of 10 people walking their Pit Bulls are "covered" in prison tats? And walking with your pants sagging makes you a non upstanding citizen? Ugly clothing fad != not an upstanding citizen. If that was the case, all of you people who wear those hideous Crocs are screwed.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top